Main Article Content

Abstract

Based on BPJS Kesehatan’s utilization review data (Social Security Administrative body for Health) until December 2023, only 32% of 273 primary healthcare facilities met the fourth level for the Controlled prolanis participant ratio (RPPT) indicator. This indicator reflects the percentage of Prolanis-registered patients diagnosed with Diabetes Mellitus (DM) or Hypertension (HT) who have achieved controlled fasting blood glucose (for DM) or controlled blood pressure (for HT), with a performance target of ≥ 5%. Meanwhile, 42% of facilities reached the Angka Kontak (AK/Contact Number) target, which measures the number of participants who contacted Primary Health Care Facilities (FKTP) compared to the total registered participants, multiplied by 1,000; the target is ≥ 150 per mille. However, 83% of facilities achieved the Non-Specialist Referral Ratio (RRNS) target, which compares the number of non-specialist case referrals to total referrals; the target is ≤ 2%. These findings highlight the need for stronger motivation mechanisms, such as financial incentives, to support FKTP in achieving better scores in the Performance-Based Capitation (KBK) model. This study explores stakeholder perceptions regarding an incentive-based KBK model using the RPPT indicator in FKTPs in Medan. Stakeholders shared several key perspectives: (1) RPPT targets should range between 5% and 10%, with incentives tied to rating levels; (2) intermediate outcome indicators should include HbA1c for DM and blood pressure for HT; (3) incentive payments should be allocated to FKTPs and managed to strengthen chronic disease services; and (4) these payments must be consistent and sustainable.

Keywords

Capitation Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension Incentives Performance-Based Capitation Capitation Diabetes Mellitus Hypertension Incentives Performance-Based Capitation

Article Details

How to Cite
Sitorus, S. H. N. (2025). Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Performance-Based Capitation Design Using Chronic Disease Indicators at Primary Health Care Facilities. Jurnal Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional, 5(1), 101 115. https://doi.org/10.53756/jjkn.v5i1.273

References

  1. Anselmi, L., Ohrnberger, J., Fichera, E., Nhassengo, P., Fernandes, Q. F., & Chicumbe, S. (2023). The impact of performance‐based financing within local health systems: Evidence from Mozambique. Health Economics, 32(7), 1525–1549. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4677
  2. Arifin, B., van Asselt, A. D. I., Setiawan, D., Atthobari, J., Postma, M. J., & Cao, Q. (2019). Diabetes distress in Indonesian patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between primary and tertiary care. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4515-1
  3. Augustian, R., & Ayuningtyas, D. (2023). Analisis Capaian Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama di Wilayah Jakarta Timur pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(7), 5205–5222. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i7.13116
  4. Cahyati, S. T., Sandra, C., & Herawati, Y. T. (2023). Implementasi Kebijakan Pembayaran Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja (KBK) di Puskesmas Kabupaten Nganjuk. Jurnal Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 12, 168–177. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkki/article/view/87474/37532
  5. DJSN, & BPJS Kesehatan. (2021). Statistik JKN 2015-2019 : Fakta dan Data Capaian Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional (1st ed.). Dewan Jaminan Sosial Nasional.
  6. Fardousi, N., Nunes da Silva, E., Kovacs, R., Borghi, J., Barreto, J. O. M., Kristensen, S. R., Sampaio, J., Shimizu, H. E., Gomes, L. B., Russo, L. X., Gurgel, G. D., & Powell-Jackson, T. (2022). Performance bonuses and the quality of primary health care delivered by family health teams in Brazil: A difference-in-differences analysis. PLOS Medicine, 19(7), e1004033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004033
  7. Glazier, R. H., Green, M. E., Frymire, E., Kopp, A., Hogg, W., Premji, K., & Kiran, T. (2019). Do Incentive Payments Reward The Wrong Providers? A Study Of Primary Care Reform In Ontario, Canada. Health Affairs, 38(4), 624–632. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05272
  8. Harniati, A., Suriah, & Amqam. H. (2018). Ketidakpatuhan Peserta BPJS Kesehatan Mengikuti Kegiatan Prolanis di Puskesmas Rangas Kabupaten Mamuju. JKMM, 1, 1–6.
  9. Jafar, T. H., Gandhi, M., de Silva, H. A., Jehan, I., Naheed, A., Finkelstein, E. A., Turner, E. L., Morisky, D., Kasturiratne, A., Khan, A. H., Clemens, J. D., Ebrahim, S., Assam, P. N., & Feng, L. (2020). A Community-Based Intervention for Managing Hypertension in Rural South Asia. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(8), 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911965
  10. Jin, Y., Tian, W., Yu, Y., Pan, W., & Yuan, B. (2021). Impact of Pay-for-performance Incentives for Contracted Family Doctor Service among Primary Healthcare Providers on Diabetes Care in China. Research Square.
  11. Kajian Kebijakan Pembayaran Insentif dan Disinsentif Pembayaran Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja pada FKTP. (2023).
  12. Kranzer, K., Simms, V., Bandason, T., Dauya, E., McHugh, G., Munyati, S., Chonzi, P., Dakshina, S., Mujuru, H., Weiss, H. A., & Ferrand, R. A. (2018). Economic incentives for HIV testing by adolescents in Zimbabwe: a randomized controlled trial. The Lancet HIV, 5(2), e79–e86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3018(17)30176-5
  13. Li, X., Krumholz, H. M., Yip, W., Cheng, K. K., De Maeseneer, J., Meng, Q., Mossialos, E., Li, C., Lu, J., Su, M., Zhang, Q., Xu, D. R., Li, L., Normand, S.-L. T., Peto, R., Li, J., Wang, Z., Yan, H., Gao, R., … Hu, S. (2020). Quality of primary health care in China: challenges and recommendations. The Lancet, 395(10239), 1802–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30122-7
  14. Ma, X., Wang, H., Yang, L., Shi, L., & Liu, X. (2019). Realigning the incentive system for China’s primary healthcare providers. BMJ, l2406. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l2406
  15. Meiriana, A., Trisnantoro, L., & Padmawati, R. S. (2019). Implementasi Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis (Prolanis) pada Penyakit Hipertensi di Puskesmas Jetis Kota Yogyakarta. Indonesia : JKKI, 08(02), 51–58.
  16. Peraturan Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial Kesehatan Nomor 7 Tahun 2019 Tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Pembayaran Kapitasi Berbasis Kinerja pada Fasilitas Kesehatan Tingkat Pertama. (2019). https://peraturanpedia.id/peraturan-badan-penyelenggara-jaminan-sosial-kesehatan-nomor-7-tahun-2019/
  17. Purnamasari, A. T., & Ningrum, H. D. (2023). Implementasi Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis (Prolanis) di Masa Pandemi COVID-19 pada FKTP di Kota Malang. JKKI, 12, 84–96.
  18. Purnamasari, S. M., & Prameswari, G. N. (2020). Pemanfaatan Program Pengelolaan Penyakit Kronis diPuskesmas. HIGEIA, 2.
  19. Salamah, S., Khafiyya, A. N., Ramadhani, R., Arfiana, M. R., Syamsuri, I., Faizah, N. N., Nugraha, D., Arifin, B., & Alkaff, F. F. (2023). Outcomes of the Indonesian Chronic Disease Management Program (PROLANIS) in Patients with Hypertension During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Rural Areas: A Preliminary Evaluation Study. Medical Science Monitor, 29. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.939797
  20. Shubrook, J. H., & Pfotenhauer, K. M. (2022). Home Blood Glucose Monitoring. Osteopathic Family Physician, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.33181/13086
  21. Tanty, H. N., Anggriani, Y., & Saragi, S. (2019). Pengaruh Prolanis Terhadapoutcome Klinik Pasien Diabetes Melitus Tipe 2 Di Puskesmas Kecamatan Pulogadung. Farmasains, 6.
  22. Yu, X., Li, Y. T., Cheng, H., Zhu, S., Hu, X.-J., Wang, J. J., Mohammed, B. H., Xie, Y. J., Hernandez, J., Wu, H.-F., & Wang, H. H. X. (2023). Longitudinal changes in blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose among 5,398 primary care patients with concomitant hypertension and diabetes: An observational study and implications for community-based cardiovascular prevention. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1120543
  23. Zivojinovic, A. S. (2022). Blood Glucose Monitoring. In Basics of Hypoglycemia. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.105605